Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM

From: safemode (safemode@voicenet.com)
Date: Sat Sep 23 2000 - 14:14:41 EST


David Ford wrote:

> safemode wrote:
>
> > i'll get back about the latest xfree86 in about 2 hours .. but if anyone has any other ideas
> > or info i can give ...it's not problem. test8 seems stable enough to keep itself up until
> > i'm ready to reboot.
>
> I should hope, I have a 20 day uptime so far.
>
> -d
>
> --
> "There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are
> virtue and talents", Thomas Jefferson [1742-1826], 3rd US President

hrmm.. It seems not even the mighty test8-pre6 can handle the cvs of X.. i'm using 90MB of swap
at the moment... and almost 4000 segments in shm.. it's like they never go away unless i kill X
... still trying to find the latest cvs.. it appears the module xc is not the latest ..
confusing ..anyways .. soon i will be compiling a new X and we shall see how it works.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 23 2000 - 21:00:29 EST