On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Molnar Ingo wrote:
> i'm still getting VM related lockups during heavy write load, in
> test9-pre5 + your 2.4.0-t9p2-vmpatch (which i understand as being your
> last VM related fix-patch, correct?). Here is a histogram of such a
> lockup:
> this lockup happens both during vanilla test9-pre5 and with
> 2.4.0-t9p2-vmpatch. Your patch makes the lockup happen a bit
> later than previous, but it still happens. During the lockup all
> dirty buffers are written out to disk until it reaches such a
> state:
It seems that conference life has taken its toll,
I seem to have reversed the logic in the test if
we can reschedule in refill_inactive() ;(
On mm/vmscan.c, please remove the `!' in the
following fragment of code:
894 if (current->need_resched && !(gfp_mask & __GFP_IO)) {
895 __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
896 schedule();
897 }
The idea was to not allow processes which have IO locks
to schedule away, but as you can see, the check is
reversed ...
With the above fix, can you still lock it up?
And if you can, does it lock up in the same way or in
a new and exciting way? ;)
regards,
Rik
--
"What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!"
-- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 23 2000 - 21:00:26 EST