Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint

From: John Wehle (john@feith.com)
Date: Tue Sep 19 2000 - 15:16:07 EST


> I see. So Jamie was right and we reproduced a case of miscompilation.

Umm ... "miscompilation"? As in the compiler produced the wrong code
based on the input provided?

  int * p;

  ...

  a = *p;

        movl p,%eax
        movl (%eax),%edx

The assembly code appears to load the address stored at p (keep in mind
that p is a pointer), then use that address to fetch the value which is
placed in a. What do you believe should have been generated by the compiler?

-- John
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Feith Systems | Voice: 1-215-646-8000 | Email: john@feith.com |
| John Wehle | Fax: 1-215-540-5495 | |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 23 2000 - 21:00:21 EST