Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint

From: John Wehle (john@feith.com)
Date: Mon Sep 18 2000 - 20:37:43 EST


> The reload of the address of `p' isn't necessary and gcc is wrong in
> generating it. p is a constant embedded into the .text section ...

It's perhaps not optimal, however I'm not sure that it's wrong. In
any case if you can supply a small standalone test case (i.e. preprocessed
source code) I'll take a quick look at things. I take it that you haven't
tried the current gcc sources?

-- John
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Feith Systems | Voice: 1-215-646-8000 | Email: john@feith.com |
| John Wehle | Fax: 1-215-540-5495 | |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 23 2000 - 21:00:19 EST