Re: ufs fs at 2.2.x and 2.4.x

From: Elmer Joandi (elmer@ylenurme.ee)
Date: Mon Sep 18 2000 - 16:57:46 EST


Alexander Viro wrote:

> Looks like I'm taking care of the UFS for a while. Yes, 2.4 is currently
> broken.

2.2.16, migrated FreeBSD to Linux on production system this weekend.
Dreamed that I just leave ufs there without copying the stuff.

1. First - it mounted a ufs but showed nothing.... long time to find the
44bsd senseless
option.
2. ok, linux up&running, samba and MS Windows Nx100MB profiles copying by few
users.
    After a while - MS tells me : media is read-only.... what a hell.
    going to command line - the partition IS now readonly....
3. -o remount,rw : disk full (not really)

It would be nice, if for 2.4 there would be mandatory printk for expermiental

and non-production modules.
So after a year someone would not try to use that stuff on production system.

elmer.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 23 2000 - 21:00:18 EST