I hate to post just to say me too, but we couldn't run 2.2.16 for
more than a few hours and even 2.2.17 would stop responding with a
load average >200 right around the time of our heaviest usage
and never come back. Assuming 2.2.18pre2aa2 doesn't crash in the
next 2 weeks (the original problem we upgraded to fix) then we'll
probably never change our kernel :) (and my associate who
believes in windows won't have anything left to complain about).
- Michael
On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, Roeland Th. Jansen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 11:26:56PM +1100, Matthew Hawkins wrote:
> > I'd like to advocate the inclusion of the majority of these patches of
> > Andrea's. I've been patching most of them in for a while now simply
> > because I've found my SMP system much more stable and useable.
>
>
> I also takled with Andrea and Alan about this. 2.2.16 will kill itself
> within hours on my system. With Andrea's patches, it lives for long
> times.
>
>
> --
> Grobbebol's Home | Don't give in to spammers. -o)
> http://www.xs4all.nl/~bengel | Use your real e-mail address /\
> Linux 2.2.16 SMP 2x466MHz / 256 MB | on Usenet. _\_v
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 15 2000 - 21:00:13 EST