On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Michael Peddemors wrote:
> in the 2.2 series, memory_end is taken from (1<<20)+EXT_MEM_K, and this
> worked.... Now looking at 2.4 it seems that it ignores all the data
> discovered by the boot loader, and just looks at the memory_map provided by
> the BIOS. So why is it getting the wrong information when a simple bootloader
> can get the right information??
Because there is more than one way to obtain memory information. That's
why I suggested trying defining STANDARD_MEMORY_BIOS_CALL.
-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 31 2000 - 21:00:23 EST