Re: SCO: "thread creation is about a thousand times faster than on

From: David Wragg (
Date: Sat Aug 26 2000 - 12:25:19 EST

Linus Torvalds <> writes:
> Well, CLONE_PARENT is already there. And has been for a long time.

And it works fine. I've modified LinuxThreads in glibc-2.1.3 to use
it (patch at <>). The remaining
loose end I have to address is to do with the setting the scheduling
parameters for the newly created thread specified in the call the
pthread_create(). (The scheduling parameters need to be set by the
time pthread_create() returns, and also by the time the new thread's
start function gets called. This can be solved by calling
sched_setscheduler() both in the parent thread and the child thread,
but then both threads need to wait until the other one has finished
making the call, and the two sched_setscheduler() syscalls tend to
contend with each other on SMP, so the performance isn't wonderful.)

> The CLONE_WAITPID patches I don't remember, so please refresh my memory
> about what they look like, and why they were needed in the first place..

POSIX says that any thread can do a wait() et al. for a child process.
But Linux currently thinks that a child processes is a child of a
particular thread, and so only that thread can wait() for it.

David Wragg

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 31 2000 - 21:00:18 EST