Re: PATCH: BeOS FS support for 2.2.16

From: John Stoffel (john@casc.com)
Date: Wed Aug 23 2000 - 14:44:31 EST

Next message: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo: "[PATCH] v2: sr.c: handling resource allocation failure"
Previous message: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: SCO: "thread creation is about a thousand times faster than onnative Linux""
In reply to: David Weinehall: "Re: PATCH: BeOS FS support for 2.2.16"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

David> befs (not beos; the fs should be there to stress that it is a
David> filesystem) is a good name I think. beosfs might be a good name
David> too.

I think beosfs is the best. It's not too long, and it's obvious what
it refers to. Within reason of course.

John
   John Stoffel - Senior Unix Systems Administrator - Lucent Technologies
         stoffel@lucent.com - http://www.lucent.com - 978-952-7548
            john.stoffel@ascend.com - http://www.ascend.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo: "[PATCH] v2: sr.c: handling resource allocation failure"
Previous message: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: SCO: "thread creation is about a thousand times faster than onnative Linux""
In reply to: David Weinehall: "Re: PATCH: BeOS FS support for 2.2.16"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 23 2000 - 21:00:09 EST