If we delivered an experimental patch for 2.2.16,
would people be willing to try it out?
Not on production systems, of course...
-M
Jason Venner wrote:
>
> What is the minimal interface we can build into the kernel that will
> allow people to experiment with all the ways they would like to do it,
> so that we can harvest the resulting knowledge and build a sane/robust
> system to carry into the future with us?
>
> We have" the EA crowd with the data attached to the inode with size
> limits (This seems to include acls) and if you think about it
> we have a whole set of attributes we carry around in the
> inode now (all the stat stuff etc)
> We have the arbitrary streams crowd.
> We have hybrids who want some parts of both.
>
> There are people arguing about
> namespace
> portability across nfs
> implementations on different underlying file systems
> Implementations in the vfs layer
> Implementations in userspace only
> Some hybrids again.
> existing tool issues
> security
> stability
> data preservation
>
> Can we come up with something that will let us play with all of the
> above to see what actually works well
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:00:35 EST