Hi Gary.
> What would be ideal is to merge these two collections: CVS is
> very nice, but to really bounce from one version source file to
> another, I have not found anything quite as nice as the new LXR
> at cvs -d:pserver:anoncvs@cvs.ping.uio.no:/cvs co lxr
My collection is primarily of original kernel tarballs and patches
(all the patches are originals, but some of the tarballs are ones I've
recreated from a previous tarball plus one or more original patches).
I see my site as being a base reference for people producing
CVS/RCS/whatever based master trees, and can see the place for
both. In fact, I'm willing to provide copies of the CD sets to anybody
interested, and that includes those developing rival products. All of
the stuff on the CD's is GPL'd or under equivalent licences, and I've
no interest in fighting that - I don't believe in it anyway.
Best wishes from Riley.
* Copyright (C) 1999, Memory Alpha Systems.
* All rights and wrongs reserved.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| There is something frustrating about the quality and speed of Linux |
| development, ie., the quality is too high and the speed is too high, |
| in other words, I can implement this XXXX feature, but I bet someone |
| else has already done so and is just about to release their patch. |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
* http://www.memalpha.cx/Linux/Kernel/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:00:30 EST