Brian Gerst wrote:
>
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > My own pet peeve is ppl avoiding the KERNEL_VERSION() macro when doing
> > LINUX_VERSION_CODE tests. Makes each test a bit more readable.
> >
> > Jeff
>
> The only logical reason to not use KERNEL_VERSION is if you want to
> support 2.0.x (which should be deprecated, IMHO anyways).
Most compat code I've seen defines KERNEL_VERSION if its absent, so
IMNSHO one should always use K_V, even on 2.0.x :)
> There are
> also several different clones of KERNEL_VERSION sprinkled throughout the
> kernel as well.
There was a patch once which exorcised these... was it from you?
Jeff
-- Jeff Garzik | Building 1024 | Andre the Giant has a posse. MandrakeSoft, Inc. |- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:00:21 EST