Followup to: <20000801185531.B2091@thune.mrc-home.org>
By author: Mike Castle <dalgoda@ix.netcom.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> If they are so stable, then why does it matter which version of the kernel
> glibc was built against and why aren't those kernel headers good enough to
> accomplish what automounter needs?
>
They usually are just fine. However, if the automount protocol is
updated, we don't want to *have* to sit through a full glibc release
cycle.
-hpa
-- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 07 2000 - 21:00:07 EST