On Tue, 01 Aug 2000, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> I've heard Alan mention specifics.. search the archives. (I rather
> doubt that our maintainers feel particularly obligated to prove spit
> to your personal satisfaction) Live with it.
So since Jes is not the KERNEL nor the X86 tree maintainer, he has not
to comment on that issue, but is spreading FUD. Live with it.
Sorry, no offense, but since Alan considers gcc 2.95.2 as fine for
2.2.17pre, I cannot see any further reason to stick with decrepit egcs.
-- Matthias Andree
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to email@example.com Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 07 2000 - 21:00:06 EST