Re: 2.4.0test5-pre4-lowlat latencies benchmarked, 2.2.16+Ingo's LL patch = strange behaviour

From: Benno Senoner (sbenno@gardena.net)
Date: Tue Jul 25 2000 - 19:13:58 EST


On Wed, 26 Jul 2000, Mark Hahn wrote:
> > Unfortunately during disk writes it performs still quite bad , about 50msec
> > during disk writes.
>
> you still mean misconfigured (PIO) disk writes, right?

for all my tests (past/present/future) assume
 EIDE DMA=on , unmask irq=on 32bit access=on

I do not care about untuned , non-DMAed IDE disks, because these are not
the typical machines of the power desktop multimedia machine.

The user who wants low latencies is willing to buy non-flawed hardware.
Bloating the kernel to deliver good latencies on old, slow polled devices etc is
simply silly.

Benno.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 31 2000 - 21:00:20 EST