Re: Direct access to hardware

From: Bob Taylor (brtaylor@inreach.com)
Date: Mon Jul 24 2000 - 02:26:34 EST


In message <Pine.LNX.4.10.10007232336000.24913-100000@master.linux-ide
.org>, An
dre Hedrick writes:

[snip]

> Or validate the commands listed in the SPEC for the default enable
> interface, and grant unrestriced access to all command with a compile
> option plus a sysctl flag that defaults in the off.
>
> You will then no longer violate the usage of the SPEC by default.
> You will preserve the drive warrenties, and protect the commerial
> distribution market place for being liable for intent.
>
> Specifically, it is public record that a distribution shipping without a
> taskfile filter in ATA and SCSI (I have this now) to carry copablity of
> knowingly with intent to sell product that allows no protection for
> improper calls to the hardware.
>
> All you have to do is provide a default approved filter, and include the
> non-default option to disable the filter to not violate unix policies of
> no-policies and cover linux and distrubtors from issues that can be deemed
> actionable.
>
> Upon the user disabling the command-filter, everyone is cleared of any and
> all issues that can be deemed actionable, and make the individual
> responsible for their actions and not you or the maintainers copablity.
>
> This is all I want.........not to be sued in the future for decisions that
> are not mine to be made.

Ah! Finally some clarity! The drive manufacturers have dumped *their*
responsibility onto the OS. If *we* don't knuckle under this
*official edict* and our hard drive(s) get clobbered by an "improper"
command then our warranty is *void*. I wonder if this cute shenanagin
will hold up in court?

Bob

-- 
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
| Bob Taylor             Email: brtaylor@inreach.com             |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|
| [Concerning MSFT innovating their way out of a wet paper bag.] |
| "Maybe if it were a very very wet paper bag, but then they'd   |
| face the insurmountable barrier of surface tension."           |
| -- Geoffrey Tobin <G.Tobin@latrobe.edu.au>                     |
+----------------------------------------------------------------+

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 31 2000 - 21:00:15 EST