On Sat, 15 Jul 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> Ok I'm going for stabilising the oddments 2.2.16 got a bit wrong before
> we move onwards. This even though a pre patch should be somewhat more
> solid than 2.2.16. It contains just the important bug fixes
Alan,
There are some VM patches which should be included IMO.
- Andrea's backport of balance_dirty_state from 2.4. The patch only
changes the time which kflushd is activated, thus it doesnt affect
stability.
- The small WRITEA patch. With it, the kernel is stable as pre9 (tested
with 8Mb box), though with decent interactiveness under high IO.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 15 2000 - 21:00:21 EST