Re: [Announce] BKL shifting into drivers and filesystems - beware

From: Andrew Clausen (clausen@gnu.org)
Date: Thu Jul 13 2000 - 05:06:33 EST


"Jeff V. Merkey" wrote:
> > To maintain the "forwarders" sounds like as much (if not more) work than
> > just fixing the errant modules in the first place. Plus you loose the
> > flexibility of changing data structures and functions which are inlined and
> > just #included, which is exactly the advantage Linus was talking about.
>
> Guys!!!!!
>
> Well, let's just wait until the monolithic kernel is 500MB in size and
> requires 8GB of ram to load (or alternately the .config file requies an
> 8GB disk to hold it when you build Linux).
>
> What I am hearing are no technical arguments, just "control, control,
> control ...".

"forwarders" puts the problem (out of date drivers) out of sight, and
out of mind. So, we'll end up with 10000 out of date drivers, and no-one
will care enough to fix it.

Having things fail to compile is good encouragement to fix drivers ;-)

Andrew Clausen

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 15 2000 - 21:00:18 EST