Re: Patch: 2.4.0-test3 still had some current->priority references

From: Dimitris Michailidis (dimitris@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com)
Date: Tue Jul 11 2000 - 15:23:53 EST

Next message: Dunlap, Randy: "RE: USB in 2.4.-test3"
Previous message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on 2.4.0-test2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

"Adam J. Richter" <adam@yggdrasil.com> writes:

> Also, the bounds appear to be different. task_struct->priority
> ranged from 0..40 (41 possible values), while task_struct->nice

I think it ranged from 0..39. If it was going up to 40 it was wrong.

> ranges from -20 to 19 (40 possible values). So, priority=0 maps
> to nice=19.

-- Dimitris Michailidis dimitris@engr.sgi.com

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Dunlap, Randy: "RE: USB in 2.4.-test3"
Previous message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on 2.4.0-test2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 15 2000 - 21:00:13 EST