kaos@ocs.com.au said:
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2000 22:20:47 -0400,
> "Michael H. Warfield" <mhw@wittsend.com> wrote:
> > Hadn't noticed this in previous kernels. It's purely cosmetic,
> >but peculiar none the less... Note - three usb lines:
> >
> >[root@alcove linux]# make modules_install
> >Installing modules under /lib/modules/2.4.0-test3/block
> >Installing modules under /lib/modules/2.4.0-test3/net
> >Installing modules under /lib/modules/2.4.0-test3/ipv4
> >Installing modules under /lib/modules/2.4.0-test3/fs
> >Installing modules under /lib/modules/2.4.0-test3/sound
> >Installing modules under /lib/modules/2.4.0-test3/usb
> >Installing modules under /lib/modules/2.4.0-test3/usb
> >Installing modules under /lib/modules/2.4.0-test3/usb
> >Installing modules under /lib/modules/2.4.0-test3/misc
>
>
> From Makefile
>
> if [ -f USB_MODULES ]; then inst_mod USB_MODULES usb; fi; \
> if [ -f USB_STORAGE_MODULES ]; then inst_mod USB_STORAGE_MODULES usb; fi; \
> if [ -f USB_SERIAL_MODULES ]; then inst_mod USB_SERIAL_MODULES usb; fi; \
>
> All perfectly normal, 3 sources of usb modules, all installed into one
> directory.
Normal in this context, that is. The problem is that the USB_STORAGE_MODULES
and USB_SERIAL_MODULES lists are generated from different directories, and we
are still using recursive make (spit) so can't easily have them add to the
main USB_MODULES list.
-- dwmw2- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 15 2000 - 21:00:12 EST