Re: Low Latency Patch

From: Stephen Harris (sweh@spuddy.mew.co.uk)
Date: Sun Jul 09 2000 - 13:30:30 EST


Robert Dinse (nanook@eskimo.com) wrote:

: And as I previously mentioned, a lot of other functionality in the patch
: has value; even if it breaks POSIX rules (and I'm sorry if I'm speaking
: blasphemly in front of those who bow down and worship the POSIX god's).
: It's a configuration option. But I also understand Linus reluctance to have

No - if it's wrong, then it becomes a seperately maintained patch outside
of the mainstraim, and not a config option. After all, mainstream distribs
won't have it enabled.

: As I stated early on though, this is a more minor issue; the patch is
: well maintained and documented, easily to apply, so it's no big deal with each

Well, then you can keep maintaining it and people that want broken behaviour
can download and patch it.

-- 
                                 Stephen Harris
                 sweh@spuddy.mew.co.uk   http://www.spuddy.org/
      The truth is the truth, and opinion just opinion.  But what is what?
       My employer pays to ignore my opinions; you get to do it for free.      
  * Meeeeow ! Call  Spud the Cat on > 01708 442043 < for free Usenet access *

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 15 2000 - 21:00:10 EST