Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux

From: Stephen Harris (sweh@spuddy.mew.co.uk)
Date: Sun Jul 09 2000 - 10:05:07 EST


Matthew Hawkins (matthew@topic.com.au) wrote:

: If something is a genuine bugfix, it should be backported immediately -

Depends on the type of bug and how easy it is to backport.

If it's a "data can be corrupted" bug, then it would be nice to backport, if
feasible.

If it's a "temporary slow down" bug, or "unecessary work" (eg unnecessary
bus reset that doesn't otherwise damage the system) then it's not necessary
to backport.

Work on the stable kernels _should_ be extremely limited. Only critical
bug fixes should be applied.

-- 
                                 Stephen Harris
                 sweh@spuddy.mew.co.uk   http://www.spuddy.org/
      The truth is the truth, and opinion just opinion.  But what is what?
       My employer pays to ignore my opinions; you get to do it for free.      
  * Meeeeow ! Call  Spud the Cat on > 01708 442043 < for free Usenet access *

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 15 2000 - 21:00:10 EST