Khimenko Victor wrote:
>
> In <E13AsCy-0005CO-00@g212.hadiko.de> Olaf Titz (olaf@bigred.inka.de) wrote:
> > PS. Why does gcc (2.95.2) say "variable defined but not used" for
> > cipe_ntoalock when I make it static?
>
> In UP kernel, right ? It's correct: spin lock operations are nop's in case
> of UP kernel...
>
That was my first guess too, but check <linux/spinlock.h>
#define spin_lock(lock) \
(void) (lock) /* Not "unused variable". */
Perhaps some gcc version are too clever?
-- Manfred- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 15 2000 - 21:00:09 EST