Re: [RFC] solution for the inet_ntoa problem, buffer allocator

• Next message: Dominik Kubla: "Re: [offtopic] Re: Patented algorithms in kernel"
• Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ricky Beam <jfbeam@bluetopia.net> writes:

|> And incedentally, you _can_ call printk() twice:
|> printk(KERN_DEBUG "foo: src=%s", inet_ntoa(src));
|> printk(KERN_DEBUG " dst=%s\n", inet_ntoa(dst));

But not _this_ way. KERN_* is only interpreted after newline, so drop it
from the second line.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab                                  "And now for something
SuSE Labs                                        completely different."
Andreas.Schwab@suse.de
SuSE GmbH, Schanzäckerstr. 10, D-90443 Nürnberg
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Dominik Kubla: "Re: [offtopic] Re: Patented algorithms in kernel"
• Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 07 2000 - 21:00:18 EST