Re: [PATCH #2] console lock grabbed too early in printk...

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Tue Jul 04 2000 - 14:08:33 EST

Next message: Chris Lattner: "Re: [PATCH #2] console lock grabbed too early in printk..."
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH #2] console lock grabbed too early in printk..."
In reply to: Chris Lattner: "Re: [PATCH #2] console lock grabbed too early in printk..."
Next in thread: Chris Lattner: "Re: [PATCH #2] console lock grabbed too early in printk..."
Reply: Chris Lattner: "Re: [PATCH #2] console lock grabbed too early in printk..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> When debugging, on a platform that you *know* it works (except for page
> faults, obviously) why shouldn't you be able to take little
> shortcuts? The point isn't production code... it's trying to locate and

There are no platforms it works on reliably except ucLinux. Therefore the
issue doesnt appear to arise

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Chris Lattner: "Re: [PATCH #2] console lock grabbed too early in printk..."
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH #2] console lock grabbed too early in printk..."
In reply to: Chris Lattner: "Re: [PATCH #2] console lock grabbed too early in printk..."
Next in thread: Chris Lattner: "Re: [PATCH #2] console lock grabbed too early in printk..."
Reply: Chris Lattner: "Re: [PATCH #2] console lock grabbed too early in printk..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 07 2000 - 21:00:15 EST