Re: 2.2 plans?

From: Justin (jguyett@andrew.cmu.edu)
Date: Fri Jun 23 2000 - 03:56:11 EST

Next message: Kees Bakker: "Re: Serious problems with test2-pre11"
Previous message: Blusjune Jung: "[Q] Can socket buffer's size be modified during ip_input.c, ip_output.c processing?"
Maybe in reply to: Scott Johnson: "2.2 plans?"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.2 plans?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I think most people are probably working on 2.4.0-testx to the detriment
of further 2.2.x backporting projects.

All x.y.z-pre<n> and x.y.z-ac<n> are patches against x.y.z.

Justin

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Kees Bakker: "Re: Serious problems with test2-pre11"
Previous message: Blusjune Jung: "[Q] Can socket buffer's size be modified during ip_input.c, ip_output.c processing?"
Maybe in reply to: Scott Johnson: "2.2 plans?"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.2 plans?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 23 2000 - 21:00:25 EST