On Sun, 18 Jun 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jun 2000, Steve Dodd wrote:
> >and I'm not convinced they're sufficient anyway, now that we do I/O through
> Right, they're at least theorically not sufficient if you do loop on loop.
> We need a pool of request for each loop request queue to avoid to deadlock
I see that the code for preventing deadlocks is not inserted into
any of the 2.4-pre kernels. Are there any plans for fixing it?
-- Gisle Sælensminde ( firstname.lastname@example.org )
ln -s /dev/null ~/.netscape/cookies
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to email@example.com Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 23 2000 - 21:00:24 EST