Re: swap-file vs. swap-partition

From: Vitezslav T. Sem (travis@inway.cz)
Date: Wed Jun 21 2000 - 22:52:20 EST


Hi.

        It's quite a long time I have made test of this and the difference was,
that swap-file was about 5 times slower, than partition. (but this was
tested on kernel 2.0.10 or so.)

bye Travis

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Enrico Weigelt [mailto:weigelt@nibiru.pauls.erfurt.thur.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2000 11:04 PM
> To: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
> Subject: swap-file vs. swap-partition
>
> hi folks,
>
> are there any performance difference between swap-files
> and swap-partitions ?
>
> bye,
> ew.
>
> --
> ---------------------------------------------
> Killing nature killing animals,
> dont disturb we love our chemicals

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 23 2000 - 21:00:23 EST