Re: [PATCH] ramfs fixes

From: Juan J. Quintela (quintela@fi.udc.es)
Date: Tue Jun 20 2000 - 06:57:36 EST


>>>>> "david" == David Gibson <dgibson@linuxcare.com> writes:

Hi

david> This actually went in somewhat recently, in 2.3.99pre something (where
david> something is around 4 IIRC). This fixed a bug in ramfs, since
david> previously the dirty bit was never being cleared.

david> At the time ramfs was the *only* place using PG_dirty - it looked like
david> it was just a misleading name for something analagous to BH_protected.

david> Obviously that's not true any more. What does the PG_dirty bit mean
david> these days?

It means that the page is Dirty??? :)))))
Seriosly, now we can have dirty swap cache pages and soon dirty page
cache pages, coming from mmaped files, not only pages from Ramfs have
that bit set.

Later, Juan.

-- 
In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they 
are different -- Larry McVoy

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 23 2000 - 21:00:19 EST