Re: Ke: Process Capabilities on 2.2.16, Sendmail problem revisited

From: Lorenzo Allegrucci (lenstra@tiscalinet.it)
Date: Sat Jun 17 2000 - 10:19:34 EST

Next message: Rik van Riel: "Re: kswapd eating too much CPU on ac16/ac18"
Previous message: Mike Galbraith: "Re: kswapd eating too much CPU on ac16/ac18"
In reply to: Aaron Denney: "Re: Ke: Process Capabilities on 2.2.16, Sendmail problem revisited"
Next in thread: Pollei: "Re: Ke: Process Capabilities on 2.2.16, Sendmail problem revisited"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 16/06/00 13:53, Aaron Denney wrote:
> The setuid bit *is* cleared on write.
> 4$ touch foo
> 4$ chmod +x foo
> 4$ chmod u+s foo
> 4$ echo "write" > foo
> 4$ ls -l foo
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 wnoise users 6 Jun 16 13:14 foo*

This seems not work for root.
Is the correct behaviour?

-- Lorenzo

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Rik van Riel: "Re: kswapd eating too much CPU on ac16/ac18"
Previous message: Mike Galbraith: "Re: kswapd eating too much CPU on ac16/ac18"
In reply to: Aaron Denney: "Re: Ke: Process Capabilities on 2.2.16, Sendmail problem revisited"
Next in thread: Pollei: "Re: Ke: Process Capabilities on 2.2.16, Sendmail problem revisited"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 23 2000 - 21:00:14 EST