On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 12:08:06PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jun 2000, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > Im interested to know if ac9/ac10 is the slow->fast change point
> > ac5 is definately the breaking point. ac5 doesn't survive make
> > -j30.. starts swinging it's VM machette at everything in sight.
> > Reversing the VM changes to ac4 restores throughput to test1
> > levels (11 minute build vs 21-26 minutes for everything
> > forward).
> > Exact tested reversals below. FWIW, page aging doesn't seem to
> > be the problem. I disabled that in ac17 and saw zero
> > difference. (What may or not be a hint is that the /* Let
> > shrink_mmap handle this swapout. */ bit in vmscan.c does make a
> > consistent difference. Reverting that bit alone takes a minimum
> > of 4 minutes off build time)
> Interesting. Not delaying the swapout IO completely broke
> performance under the tests I did here...
> Delayed swapout vs. non-delayed swapouts was the difference
> between 300 swapouts/s vs. 700 swapouts/s (under a load
> with 400 swapins/s).
I can understand it... When you wake up kswapd you need more memory, and if you
don't free it you will be called again. And again. And again. (leaf is a slow
box; both top and vmstat eat 20% CPU each with 1 second updates all the time).
So it does waste more time.
Worst case (dpkg --install) in ac4 gets kswapd at about 5%. Which considering
that top or vmstat use 20% is low enough. Also it gets more throughput because
it has no need to waste time thinking.
With ac4 I get the HDD light full on during the worse moments; with ac16/18 it
just sits there in kswapd and the light blinks at about 1Hz.
> OTOH, I can imagine it being better if you have a very small
> LRU cache, something like less than 1/2 MB.
You can imagine it being better in some random rare condition I don't care
about. People have been noticing speed problems related to kswapd. This is not
-- Cesar Eduardo Barros email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to email@example.com Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 23 2000 - 21:00:13 EST