Re: sched.c

From: Davide Libenzi (davidel@maticad.it)
Date: Fri Jun 16 2000 - 07:59:19 EST


> I could understand the need for
> if (weight > c)
> c = weight, next = p;
> It could as well have been
> if (weight > c)
> {
> c = weight;
> next = p;
> }
>
> Since both compile to the same intermediate assembly code.

Compactness - the more compact You write ( clarity provided ) the more
information ( code )
You can keep under Your sight without scrolling Your sources.

Davide

--
Feel free, feel Debian !

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 23 2000 - 21:00:11 EST