You know, this entire crypto thread just reminded me of something...
How many people have heard of GNU Privacy Guard (gpg)? Because of patent
restrictions (i.e. laws), it cannot be distributed in the United States
with an RSA engine in it. Oddly enough, there is a run-time plug-in module
that will provide the RSA engine it needs to function perfectly.
Why don't we just do something like this? Aim to make any crypto
components of the kernel modularizeable. Perhaps even attempt to make them
compilable outside of a normal kernel source tree. It might be slightly
ineffecient to have to do a table lookup to determine if crypto is
available at runtime, but does it cost us that much?
-- Matthew Dharm Home: email@example.com Senior Engineer, QCP Inc. Work: firstname.lastname@example.org
Ye gods! I have feet??! -- Dust Puppy User Friendly, 12/4/1997
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to email@example.com Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 07 2000 - 21:00:14 EST