Alan Cox writes:
> > So put the initialization of driver after the procfs one. It's not a
> > problem in procfs, it's problem in the driver. It has no business
> > registering the stuff in procfs before the thing is initialized, to start
> > with.
>
> Looks like procfs is initialised way too late then. I think procfs is the
> one that needs moving, not all the drivers. In order to meet these
> requirements in fact procfs must be initialised before basically any block or
> char driver.
Alan & Al,
Please see my fs/Makefile patch posted earlier on this subject that re-orders
the initcall order to fix this problem.
_____
|_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+-
| | Russell King rmk@arm.linux.org.uk --- ---
| | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/~rmk/aboutme.html / / |
| +-+-+ --- -+-
/ | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\
/ | | | --- |
+-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 15 2000 - 21:00:24 EST