On Wed, 10 May 2000, Sébastien Côté wrote:
> David Woodhouse wrote :
>
> > > I know about that projet and they're working on a 2.3 port for now.
> >
> > That's true - a fact which had embarrassingly escaped my attention briefly.
> > But I'm told that it's far easier to backport 2.3 code to 2.2 than it is to
> > port 2.0 code.
> > > Anyway, this doesn't really answer my question, I'd really like to
> > > know about the i_count issue.
> >
> > Sorry, I have no clue. I'm having enough problems with block devices. Isn't
> > this already done in Alex's port, though?
>
> Yes, it's a lot easier to port from 2.3 since 2.2 introduced a lot of
> changes in the VFS. I used Alex's port to help me and now everything
> compiles without a glitch. However, I did not start my flash driver yet
> so I can't really test it that's why I'm trying the best that I can to
> understand how to VFS works in order to eliminate bugs.
Can you not use the mtdram virtual flash device? That's what i'm using.
/ Alex
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 15 2000 - 21:00:15 EST