On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 07:02:01PM +1000, Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au> wrote:
> (1) and (2) should always be safe. (3) will have false positives if it
> has not been overwritten yet. AFAICT there is nothing I can do about
> that.
The exception unwinding information gcc outputs (or can be made to output)
could be used to reliably find stack frames (gcc itself has to do this
reliably).
At least for a debugging build this might eb a viable path to follow.
-- -----==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg@opengroup.org |e| -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ The choice of a GNU generation | |- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 15 2000 - 21:00:15 EST