Re: [PATCH] Recent VM fiasco - fixed

From: Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com)
Date: Tue May 09 2000 - 14:50:47 EST


On 9 May 2000, Christoph Rohland wrote:

> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> writes:
>
> > Try out the really recent one - pre7-8. So far it hassome good reviews,
> > and I've tested it both on a 20MB machine and a 512MB one..
>
> Nope, does more or less lockup after the first attempt to swap
> something out. I can still run ls and free. but as soon as something
> touches /proc it locks up. Also my test programs do not do anything
> any more.

This may be due to an unrelated bug with the task_lock() fixing (see
separate patch from Manfred for that one).

> I append the mem and task info from sysrq. Mem info seems to not
> change after lockup.

I suspect that if you do right-alt + scrolllock, you'll see it looping on
a spinlock. Which is why the memory info isn't changing ;)

But I'll double-check the shm code (I didn't test anything that did any
shared memory, for example).

                        Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 15 2000 - 21:00:14 EST