> > Signatures don't make the kernel any more secure, they just give the illusion
> > of security - IMO, the worst possible kind.
>
> They are very valuable for distribution of modules. For example in ensuring
> a Red Hat or Debian kernel package isnt tampered with. At runtime I tend to
> agree.
Don't most package-managers already have that feature ??
Igmar
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 07 2000 - 21:00:21 EST