Re: How is CONFIG_MODVERSIONS and MODVERSIONS related?

From: Steve Dodd (steved@loth.demon.co.uk)
Date: Sun May 07 2000 - 06:13:38 EST

Next message: Manfred Spraul: "Re: Help! Too many links - #define EXT2_LINK_MAX 32000 ?"
Previous message: James Sutherland: "Re: Help! Too many links - #define EXT2_LINK_MAX 32000 ?"
In reply to: Peter 'Luna' Runestig: "Re: How is CONFIG_MODVERSIONS and MODVERSIONS related?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 12:50:55PM +0200, Peter 'Luna' Runestig wrote:

> 2. The two macros CONFIG_MODVERSIONS and MODVERSIONS are related, ie if
> CONFIG_MODVERSIONS is defined, so is MODVERSIONS and vice versa.

No, IIRC the makefiles only define MODVERSIONS when they are building
modules (a lot of code compiles as both modules or statically linked), and
CONFIG_MODVERSIONS is defined. The reason is statically linked code should
not link against the mangled names.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Manfred Spraul: "Re: Help! Too many links - #define EXT2_LINK_MAX 32000 ?"
Previous message: James Sutherland: "Re: Help! Too many links - #define EXT2_LINK_MAX 32000 ?"
In reply to: Peter 'Luna' Runestig: "Re: How is CONFIG_MODVERSIONS and MODVERSIONS related?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 07 2000 - 21:00:20 EST