> > There's an article somewhere on www.gnu.org where RMS advocates, in
> > effect, making GPL code "proprietary" to the GPL mob, to force people to
> > use the GPL for their own code if they want access to GPLed libraries.
> > This was rather worrying...
>
> Which makes RMS no better than Billy et al. So much for *freedom* eh?
I would suggest you read both licenses and compare and also read the reasoning
behind his statement. I'd also suggest you transfer the discussion to the
more appropriate gnu.misc.discuss group
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 07 2000 - 21:00:19 EST