Re: [OOPS] report for 2.3.99-pre7-5 on sparc64

From: Ben Collins (bcollins@debian.org)
Date: Fri May 05 2000 - 13:47:01 EST


On Fri, May 05, 2000 at 11:25:48AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 14:13:08 -0400
> From: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
>
> Sorry, I used egcs64 :)
>
> You do mean:
>
> gcc version egcs-2.92.11 19980921 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental)
>
> Right? :-)

blowme:~# cat /proc/version
Linux version 2.3.99-pre7 (root@blowme) (gcc version egcs-2.92.11 19980921 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental)) #1 Thu May 4 23:46:53 EDT 2000

(this includes all of the same patches that jakub has in the RH version,
AFAIK)

> Note, there is nothing special configured on the system. I don't have X
> running, nor any special filesystems (not even nfs). It's pretty cut and
> dry so I can bootstrap 64bit (that reminds me, I'm running 64bit binaries
> here, maybe that's a clue).
>
> Is dpkg 64-bit? Actually, if there were any 64-bit binaries running
> around they could be the cause. I'll try to think about the bug on
> these terms now, but send me any new oops's you get.
>

dpkg isn't compiled 64bit yet, but I do have lots of other small programs
running in 64bit (shared libs). I don't think any were running at the
time, but of course that doesn't exclude corruption.

Ben

-- 
 -----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  bcollins@debian.org  --  bcollins@openldap.org  --  bcollins@linux.com  '
 `---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 07 2000 - 21:00:18 EST