Re: mnt_count accounting broken

From: Tigran Aivazian (tigran@veritas.com)
Date: Fri May 05 2000 - 10:01:50 EST

Next message: Aki M Laukkanen: "Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talking to Solaris2.6/2.7 (fwd)"
Previous message: Gannoune Lassaad: "nfs as a loadable module ?"
In reply to: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: mnt_count accounting broken"
Next in thread: Alexander Viro: "Re: mnt_count accounting broken"
Reply: Alexander Viro: "Re: mnt_count accounting broken"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

What is the point of the first check if(mnt->mnt_count > 2) in
do_umount()? It is re-checked later on after shrink_dcache_sb/fsync_dev so
why checking in the beginning as well? I do not see why it is needed and
things work much better without it...

Regards,
Tigran

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Aki M Laukkanen: "Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talking to Solaris2.6/2.7 (fwd)"
Previous message: Gannoune Lassaad: "nfs as a loadable module ?"
In reply to: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: mnt_count accounting broken"
Next in thread: Alexander Viro: "Re: mnt_count accounting broken"
Reply: Alexander Viro: "Re: mnt_count accounting broken"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 07 2000 - 21:00:17 EST