Re: calls to d_active_refs() from do_umount() and multiple mounts.

From: Tigran Aivazian (tigran@veritas.com)
Date: Thu May 04 2000 - 13:00:59 EST

Next message: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: set_fs_pwd/set_fs_root(tsk, NULL, NULL) are OK?"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: set_fs_pwd/set_fs_root(tsk, NULL, NULL) are OK?"
In reply to: Tigran Aivazian: "calls to d_active_refs() from do_umount() and multiple mounts."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 4 May 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> (unless mnt->mnt_count plays some role here - at the
> moment I ignore it because it is always 1 anyway).

ok, I realize that the above is not true (i.e. mntget/put change
mnt_count) but the original question is still valid,

Regards,
Tigran

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: set_fs_pwd/set_fs_root(tsk, NULL, NULL) are OK?"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: set_fs_pwd/set_fs_root(tsk, NULL, NULL) are OK?"
In reply to: Tigran Aivazian: "calls to d_active_refs() from do_umount() and multiple mounts."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 07 2000 - 21:00:15 EST