Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talking to Solaris2.6/2.7 (fwd)

• Next message: shane: "Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talking to Solaris2.6/2.7 (fwd)"
• Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [patch] Yenta module race condition"
• Next in thread: shane: "Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talking to Solaris2.6/2.7 (fwd)"
• Reply: shane: "Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talking to Solaris2.6/2.7 (fwd)"
• Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talking to Solaris2.6/2.7 (fwd)"
• Reply: James Sutherland: "Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talking to Solaris2.6/2.7 (fwd)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>>>>> "shane" == shane <shane@bratnet.net> writes:

shane> Im trying the bigger size on linux now.
>> ncftp /pub > bin ncftp /pub > mget linux* linux-2.3.99-pre5.tar.gz:
>> 19.13 MB 1.76MB/s ncftp /pub >

shane> Not Much Difference :(

You're using WHAT as a benchmark?

I am sorry but ftp is like the stupidiest thing to use for any sort of
benchmarking. It doesn't do anything to pipeline data and many of the
older deamons set ridiculously low socket buffer limits.

Try a real benchmark.

Jes

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: shane: "Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talking to Solaris2.6/2.7 (fwd)"
• Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [patch] Yenta module race condition"
• Next in thread: shane: "Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talking to Solaris2.6/2.7 (fwd)"
• Reply: shane: "Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talking to Solaris2.6/2.7 (fwd)"
• Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talking to Solaris2.6/2.7 (fwd)"
• Reply: James Sutherland: "Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talking to Solaris2.6/2.7 (fwd)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 07 2000 - 21:00:15 EST