Keith Owens wrote:
>
> On Wed, 03 May 2000 17:22:45 -0700,
> Linda Walsh <law@sgi.com> wrote:
> >James Sutherland wrote:
> >> The other potential problem is claiming interrupt 0x81 for the new 64-bit
> >> syscall - I'd guess this SHOULD be ok, but is it??
> > Could be asked of any interrupt vector. I know it wasn't used
> >in any of the ia32 specific kernel code.
>
> Conflict! The SGI kernel debugging code (kdb) uses interrupt 0x81. It
> is in kdb v0.6, kdb v1.1, the latest IKD patch and the SGI XFS code,
> all of which have been released to the wild. Look for KDBENTER_VECTOR.
--- Ok...any your alternate suggestion would be...?-- Linda A Walsh | Trust Technology, Core Linux, SGI law@sgi.com | Voice: (650) 933-5338
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 07 2000 - 21:00:14 EST