On Wed, 3 May 2000, Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote:
> while ((mm->swap_cnt << 2 * (i + 1) < max_cnt) && i++ < 10)
> /* nothing */;
>
> I'm not that good at C, mas aren't expressions with side-effects
> ill-defined? How can we be sure (short of tracking the gcc
> mailing lists) that i will be incremented after the left part of
> the test?
Because it is defined in the C standard?
Rik
-- The Internet is not a network of computers. It is a network of people. That is its real strength.Wanna talk about the kernel? irc.openprojects.net / #kernelnewbies http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 07 2000 - 21:00:13 EST