Re: [RFC] Flat /lib/modules/`uname -r`

From: Keith Owens (kaos@ocs.com.au)
Date: Sat Apr 22 2000 - 00:14:11 EST

Next message: Linda Walsh: "Re: Session IDs & LUID point to consider."
Previous message: willy@thepuffingroup.com: "Re: [PATCH] f_op->poll() without lock_kernel()"
In reply to: Dunlap, Randy: "RE: [RFC] Flat /lib/modules/`uname -r`"
Next in thread: Ricky Beam: "Re: [RFC] Flat /lib/modules/`uname -r`"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 21 Apr 2000 21:58:12 -0700,
"Dunlap, Randy" <randy.dunlap@intel.com> wrote:
>Do you have an expected timeframe for when debugging support
>will be available for 2.3.99++ kernels?

Barring any unexpected problem, about 5 hours. I already have kdb v1.0
working on 2.3.99-pre6-5, my kallsyms patch just compiled, now to merge
the pair.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Linda Walsh: "Re: Session IDs & LUID point to consider."
Previous message: willy@thepuffingroup.com: "Re: [PATCH] f_op->poll() without lock_kernel()"
In reply to: Dunlap, Randy: "RE: [RFC] Flat /lib/modules/`uname -r`"
Next in thread: Ricky Beam: "Re: [RFC] Flat /lib/modules/`uname -r`"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 23 2000 - 21:00:20 EST