Re: [BUG] socket buffer size different then set

From: Kurt Roeckx (Q@ping.be)
Date: Fri Apr 21 2000 - 13:11:07 EST

Next message: Manfred Spraul: "Re: [PATCH] /proc/locks bugfix"
Previous message: Manfred Spraul: "[PATCH] f_op->poll() without lock_kernel()"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: [BUG] socket buffer size different then set"
Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: [BUG] socket buffer size different then set"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 10:48:10AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 19:37:17 +0200
> From: Kurt Roeckx <Q@ping.be>
>
> Is this a bug, or normal behaviour?
>
> This is normal behavior.

May I ask why? Other OS's don't seem to do this.

Kurt

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Manfred Spraul: "Re: [PATCH] /proc/locks bugfix"
Previous message: Manfred Spraul: "[PATCH] f_op->poll() without lock_kernel()"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: [BUG] socket buffer size different then set"
Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: [BUG] socket buffer size different then set"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 23 2000 - 21:00:19 EST