Re: memory handling in pre5/pre6

From: Andrea Arcangeli (andrea@suse.de)
Date: Fri Apr 21 2000 - 08:29:07 EST


On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:

>Which is good. The page was accessed, so we're much better
>off looking for a non-accessed page that's mapped in a
>process than throwing out a recently accessed page and doing
>away with page aging...

I see your point and ok we can do that.

Also the pages inserted to the lru should all have the referenced bit
clear and we're getting that wrong right now. I did a patch in my ftp area
the try to fix that (it's called pagecache-aging-1). However also the
buffer cache should clear the referenced bit while adding pages to the
buffer cache while recycling from the freelist (and it's not yet doing
that).

>[..] Sure, it generates a bit more
>swapOUT traffic,[..]

I known about this bit indeed ;). However looking at the amount of swap
with 2.3.99-pre is not good idea anyway...

Andrea

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 23 2000 - 21:00:19 EST