Re: [RFC] automount based devfs replacement

From: Horst von Brand (vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl)
Date: Thu Apr 20 2000 - 08:28:29 EST

Next message: Erik van Asselt: "Packet loss with kernel 2.3.99.pre6-3?"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] Generic dead function optimisation"
In reply to: Rogier Wolff: "Re: [RFC] automount based devfs replacement"
Next in thread: Rogier Wolff: "Re: [RFC] automount based devfs replacement"
Reply: Rogier Wolff: "Re: [RFC] automount based devfs replacement"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl (Rogier Wolff) said:

[...]

> As we've come to the conclusion that a devfsd is a necessity, the
> "extra" deamon cannot be considered a problem. Moreover, this is just
> a "at boot time" thing that needs to run. You get back your process
> slot once it is done.

Nope. Think hot-plugging.

-- Dr. Horst H. von Brand mailto:vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Erik van Asselt: "Packet loss with kernel 2.3.99.pre6-3?"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] Generic dead function optimisation"
In reply to: Rogier Wolff: "Re: [RFC] automount based devfs replacement"
Next in thread: Rogier Wolff: "Re: [RFC] automount based devfs replacement"
Reply: Rogier Wolff: "Re: [RFC] automount based devfs replacement"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 23 2000 - 21:00:17 EST